Nation's Biggest Immigration Law Firm Under Federal Scrutiny For Hiring Advice
Although this is an American story, it has considerable relevance in Canada and all immigrant-receiving countries for the following reasons:
(1) Immigration law, which is intended to protect the country's workforce from foreign competition, is being subverted by the country's immigration industry which looks for ways to circumvent the law in order to provide profits to itself and to its clients. It is alleged that the largest immigration law firm in the U.S. was advising employers how to avoid hiring “apparently qualified” American workers.
(2) Canada's federal government has been intimidated for far too long by an immigration industry which presents itself as an honest actor. Undoubtedly, there are honest people involved, some of whom have tried to point out the rampant fraud. But there are many others who are working in this industry to perpetuate their own empires and to maximize their own profits at the expense of Canada.
(3) The work of immigration consultants and immigration lawyers, in both private and public areas (such as provincial nominee programmes) has to be scrutinized much more carefully to detect fraud. The disastrous Nova Scotia mentorship programme of the last 2 years is an example to be avoided. Provincial governments have a constitutional right to be involved in immigration. But they should be exercising their right intelligently. They should not allow themselves to be duped into mere cheer-leading for the local immigration industry which repeats the standard, feel-good immigration phrases while covering up a large number of scams.
(4) The easiest way to reduce fraud is to reduce the opportunity for fraud. The federal government will have to pay to do some scrutinizing, but it can avoid very costly scrutiny programmes by directing many in Canada's immigration industry towards alternate “real” employment. Significant cuts to immigration levels will achieve this objective.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nation's Biggest Immigration Law Firm Under Federal Scrutiny for Hiring Advice
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
FOXNEWS.COM
WASHINGTON The nation's largest immigration law firm is under federal scrutiny over whether it helped major U.S. corporations disqualify American job applicants and give thousands of high-paying positions to immigrants.
The unprecedented Labor Department inquiry centers on Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy a New York firm at the forefront of a political effort to ease hiring of skilled foreign workers.
The Labor Department is auditing all pending applications for legal immigrant workers the firm has filed on behalf of its corporate clients.
Fragomen's prestigious client roster includes General Electric Co., IBM Corp., Cisco Systems Inc., Intel Corp. and Bank of America Corp., according to company publications and trade journals. The firm also represents The Associated Press on immigration issues.
The inquiry focuses on the applications filed by the firm, but there was no indication that the inquiry involves any of Fragomen's clients.
The Labor Department said that Fragomen may have improperly advised clients to contact a Fragomen attorney before hiring “apparently qualified” U.S. workers. The agency said lawyers can advise employers on how to follow the law in hiring immigrants but can't dissuade them from deciding a U.S. worker is qualified.
The audit focuses on what is known as the permanent foreign labor certification, or PERM, process. Companies normally use it to permanently hire legal immigrants who have been working for them on temporary visas. It essentially allows companies to sponsor workers for green cards, the first step to U.S. citizenship.
Before applying, companies must recruit and try to find a qualified U.S. worker for the same job. If they do, they can't hire the foreigner.
Fragomen said its lawyers have complied with the law and rejected the idea that lawyers can't give critical legal advice about the complicated process for permanently hiring legal immigrants.
“We do not tell our clients whom to hire or not to hire,” the firm said in a statement, adding that it is negotiating with the Labor Department to end the audit.
It's unclear exactly how many of Fragomen's applications the Labor Department is auditing as a part of the inquiry that was announced in early June, but the number is easily in the thousands.
With more than 200 attorneys, Fragomen is overwhelmingly the biggest player in an industry where firms with several dozen immigration attorneys are considered large firms.
In 2004, the last year the Labor Department made such information about law firms public, Fragomen lawyers filed more than 3,600 labor certifications more than twice as many as its largest competitor.
The firm's managing director has also said Fragomen represents about half of the Fortune 100 companies. Last year, Fortune 100 companies submitted more than 5,300 applications. The jobs listed in the applications pay an average of $80,000. And the largest group of applicants were from India.
The Labor Department audit is lending firepower to workers, unions and other groups, that for years have said U.S. workers are being replaced with cheaper immigrant labor.
“The reason an employer pays its lawyer $3,000 to $5,000 is because they need help in not finding qualified American workers,” said Kim Berry, president of the Programmers Guild, an advocacy group that believes immigrant hiring rules are too lax.
The audit also has drawn objections from immigration attorneys, unnerving some who fear it could restrict when they can advise clients seeking to hire immigrant workers.
“The Department of Labor said this firm had engaged in something improper and then went on to describe something that no one in this field, employer or attorney, finds improper,” said Crystal Williams, programs director for American Immigration Lawyers Association.
The Labor Department said Fragomen may have broken the rules because some immigrant recruiting forms the law firm provides to the corporate clients say: “After an interview, should any of the applicants appear to be qualified for the position, please contact a Fragomen attorney immediately to further discuss the candidate's background as it relates to the requirements stated for said position.”
The department said it would decide whether any of the pending applications submitted by Fragomen clients should be denied or subjected to additional government oversight.
“The department takes seriously its responsibility to ensure that American workers have access to jobs they are qualified and willing to do and that their wages and working conditions are not adversely affected by the hiring of foreign workers,” the department said in its news release.
Labor Department officials refused interview requests. Spokesman Terry Shawn said the agency does not comment on ongoing legal matters, despite issuing news releases on the matter.
The American Immigration Lawyers Association criticized the audit and news releases announcing the inquiry.
“It is crystal clear that attorneys have a legitimate role in counseling employers during PERM recruitment, a highly structured process governed by detailed regulations and complex administrative case law,” executives of the association said in a letter to Labor Secretary Elaine Chao.
Aman Kapoor, founder of Immigration Voice, whose membership includes many immigrant workers going through the labor certification process, fears the only outcome will be even longer waits for green cards.
“No matter which way you look at it,” Kapoor said, “whether it's the fault of the lawyer, or the fault of the agency or the employer, the person who is going to suffer at the very end is going to be a legal, law-abiding, high-skilled immigrant.”
