Patriots Don’t “Adapt” To Cultural Suicide

Elizabeth Jones
Executive Director,
North Shore Multicultural Society
North Vancouver, B.C.

Ms. Jones,

In the North Shore News, you were quoted as saying—in response to Chinese signage in your area—that:

“We all grow up within a certain culture and community the way it is” and “Some people are better at adapting to change than others.”

http://www.nsnews.com/news/chinese-signs-questioned-in-west-vancouver-1.1204398

You are certainly right about that. Before the 1940s, the Dutch, Danes and Norwegians, for example, all grew up within a certain culture and community—one that they were rather fond of actually—but they didn’t like the cultural “change” that was imposed upon them by the “immigrants” in jackboots from Germany. But as you would say, some of them (Quislings, collaborators and traitors) were better at adapting to this change than others. In fact, most of the Dutch, Danes and Norwegians refused to accept their own displacement or believe the persistent and omnipresent propaganda that was vigourously inflicted upon them day after day, year after year. They never felt “enriched” by the presence of those they never invited. Nor did they ever become reconciled to German signage and German symbols.

And there is no doubt that if the Nazis had won the war, and if the German occupation had lasted for another twenty years, a whole generation of Dutch, Danish and Norwegian youth would have been indoctrinated to believe that the “change” was a very good thing. Just as Canadian youth today have been indoctrinated to believe in the virtues of imported cultural diversity, and reconciled to their own dislocation and marginalization. Many of those young Canadians have since left their classrooms to occupy strategic positions in newsrooms, board rooms, court rooms, faculty rooms, ethno-cultural lobbies, and the Immigration industry. All are now “spreading the word” and “advancing” Canada’s ongoing colonization.

No Canadian government ever had a mandate to change the ethnic profile of Canada, nor did its bipartisan policy of mass immigration ever enjoy the support of the majority of the population. It is therefore to be expected that a great many of us, in fact most of us I would suggest, regard our “occupation” in much the same way as the Dutch, Danes, and Norwegians (plus the Poles, French et al.) regarded German occupation in World War Two. The proliferation of Chinese-only signage rubs our noses in the reality of our occupation. It is, as you characterized it, a “flashpoint”. But it is not a flashpoint that triggers “racism” as you contend, but rather, nationalism that has been long suppressed, but is still alive, like a dormant volcano on the verge of eruption. This is not about race, it is about culture. It is not about multi-racialism but multiculturalism. The two are too often conflated.

 While most Canadians recognize the multi-ethnic character of their nation to be a sociological fact, and oppose forced assimilation, they do not accept the policy of Official Multiculturalism which, with the use of our tax dollars, endeavours to arrest and impede natural assimilation and instead, promote the cultural balkanization of society. Canadians do not want manufactured multiculturalism. They value cultural cohesion as much or more than “diversity”. That we share a common language is essential to that cohesion. Two official languages is as much as we can handle.

Quebec took steps to see that French remained the dominant and most pervasive language in the province. Why then is it “racist” to demand that Anglophone Canada be able to do the same? Why is it generally conceded that Quebeckers have the right to defend their culture, but not us?

George Bernard Shaw once remarked that “The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.”

In other words, compliant “reasonable” people tolerate the intolerable—“unreasonable” people do not.

I, among many others, will not “adapt” to the world you wish us to live in. I, among many others, will not “adapt” to a Canada that resembles the Tower of Babel, a microcosm of the (Dis)United Nations. I, among many others, will not “adapt” to the ideology of “Multicultural-schism”. I, among many others, will not “adapt” to the promotion of cultural apartheid. I, among many others, will not “adapt” to a Canada where the two founding cultures are reduced to mere fragments of the “mosaic”. I, and many others, are “unreasonable” people. And progress depends on people like us. We refuse to tolerate the intolerable. We will never say die.

P.S. At least the “immigrants” from Germany did not inflate the real estate market in the European countries they occupied.

Tim Murray
July 28, 2014

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++